Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
15.65 USD | -0.95% | -8.80% | -23.36% |
May. 28 | Cleveland-Cliffs to Buy US Assets of Novolipetsk Steel | MT |
May. 28 | Cleveland-Cliffs Reportedly in Talks to Buy NLMK | CI |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.
- The company shows low valuation levels, with an enterprise value at 0.52 times its sales.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- The company does not generate enough profits, which is an alarming weak point.
- The company benefits from high valuations in earnings multiples.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Iron & Steel
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-23.36% | 7.51B | B+ | ||
-9.54% | 38.6B | B- | ||
+29.18% | 26.75B | C+ | ||
-24.52% | 21.28B | B | ||
-9.29% | 20.72B | C+ | ||
+5.42% | 19.82B | B | ||
+4.44% | 19.72B | B | ||
+6.74% | 9.28B | B | ||
-21.69% | 8.6B | B | ||
-.--% | 7.73B | - | B |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- CLF Stock
- Ratings Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.