Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
5.66 AUD | +0.35% | +4.62% | -24.23% |
Jul. 04 | Weak US Labor Data Raises Australian Shares to More than One-Week High | MT |
Jul. 04 | Stockland Cites 'Compelling Reasons' to Allay Competition Concerns Over Lendlease Projects Acquisition | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
Strengths
- The company's attractive earnings multiples are brought to light by a P/E ratio at 9.55 for the current year.
- The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.
- As a percentage of sales and without taking into account depreciation and amortization, the company has relatively low margins.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Real Estate Development & Operations
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-24.50% | 2.61B | B | ||
-0.18% | 25.84B | B- | ||
+30.87% | 25.84B | B- | ||
+15.45% | 24.94B | A- | ||
-21.08% | 23.53B | B | ||
+33.53% | 19.99B | A- | ||
-0.29% | 19.79B | A | ||
+1.01% | 19.44B | B- | ||
+47.49% | 17.8B | B+ | ||
-10.61% | 14.89B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- LLC Stock
- Ratings Lendlease Group