Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
110 GBX | -4.18% |
|
-1.25% | -9.69% |
10:44am | Chrysalis gains from Graphcore stake sale | AN |
09:42am | DFS Furniture makes Currys CFO Bruce Marsh non-exec director | AN |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
Strengths
- With regards to fundamentals, the enterprise value to sales ratio is at 0.89 for the current period. Therefore, the company is undervalued.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.
- The company does not generate enough profits, which is an alarming weak point.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- With a 2024 P/E ratio at 37.14 times the estimated earnings, the company operates at rather significant levels of earnings multiples.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Home Furnishings
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-9.69% | 342M | B | ||
-0.74% | 8.48B | B | ||
-21.03% | 3.1B | C- | ||
-7.02% | 1.94B | C | ||
+10.24% | 1.68B | B- | ||
-6.33% | 1.57B | - | ||
-16.47% | 1.34B | C+ | ||
+12.62% | 988M | - | ||
-5.47% | 832M | - | ||
-11.40% | 745M | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- DFS Stock
- Ratings DFS Furniture plc