AURELIA METALS LIMITED |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 0.195 AUD | 0.00% |
|
+5.41% | +77.27% |
| Apr. 24 | Jefferies Upgrades Aurelia Metals to Buy from Hold, Price Target is AU$0.23 | MT |
| Apr. 23 | Aurelia Metals Posts AU$106.9 Million Cash, AU$4.3 Million Operating Cash Flow for March Quarter | MT |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.
- According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is poor.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- The company has attractive valuation levels with a low EV/sales ratio compared with its peers.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised upwards significantly.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Diversified Mining
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +77.27% | 220M | C- | ||
| -13.41% | 146B | C+ | ||
| -8.78% | 112B | C | ||
| +1.04% | 71.84B | C+ | ||
| +7.42% | 43.17B | B | ||
| -13.90% | 40.97B | B+ | ||
| +23.08% | 36.85B | C+ | ||
| +111.65% | 33.02B | A- | ||
| +22.91% | 25.11B | B- | ||
| +79.42% | 20.35B | C+ |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
-
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
Valuation
P/E ratio
-
EV / Sales
Price to Book
Price to Free Cash Flow
-
Yield
-
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Environment
Emissions
Innovation
Use of resources
Governance
CSR Strategy
Management
Shareholders
Controversy
Controversy
Technical analysis
ST Timing
MT Timing
LT Timing
RSI
Bollinger Spread
Unusual volumes
- Stock Market
- Equities
- AMI Stock
- Ratings Aurelia Metals Limited
