Liver-specific silencing of INHBE with ARO-INHBE, an siRNA therapeutic, for metabolic diseases
Michelle Ngai, Feng Liu, Puhui Li, Xiaokai Li, Cole Christy, Holly Hamilton, Maria Afrazi, Pierce Sullivan, Tao Pei, James Hamilton, Zhi-Ming Ding
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc., Madison, WI, USA
Poster # 1626-P
INTRODUCTION
PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES OF INHBE siRNA IN RODENT MODELS
INHBE silencing in the db/db mouse model results in an
improvement in body composition
• Incretin-based therapies are powerful and effective for obesity |
and metabolic outcomes, but significant loss of lean mass and |
adverse GI events at high dose levels has prompted the |
Knockdown of hepatic INHBE mRNA expression with surrogate RNAi-trigger results in an improved body composition
with 1) BW suppression, 2) fat mass loss, 3) lean mass retention
Saline
Body Weight
4 | 0 |
INHBE (9 mpk) | Tirzepatide (0.48 mpk) | INHBE (9 mpk) + Tirzepatide (0.48 mpk) |
Body Composition |
40 |
32.08 |
100000 |
AUC of oGTT
✱
✱✱✱
ns
identification of a novel mechanism of action |
• Large-scale human genetic studies support an association |
between pLOF INHBE variants and 1) reduced WHRadjBMI, 2) |
improved metabolic profile including lower TG, higher HDL, and |
INHBE expression
expression | 2.0 | |
1.5 | 1.00 | |
HBE | 1.0 | |
▪ DIO mice were |
administered with saline |
(weekly), mouse |
surrogate ARO-INHBE (9 |
Body Composition by DEXA
35 | Saline | |||
30 | ||||
26.08 | 27.37 | INHBE | ||
(g) | 25 | 23.01 | 21.42 | Tirzepatide |
20 | 17.80 |
ngecha | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
BW% | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
- 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | |
1 | |||||||||||||||||||
- 4 | 0 |
30 | 24.17 | 24.80 | 24.81 | 80000 | |||||
)(g Mass | 23.72 | 24.21 | 21.96 | ||||||
(OGTT)AUC | |||||||||
20 | 17.61 | 60000 | |||||||
40000 | |||||||||
10 | 20000 | ||||||||
0 | 0 | ||||||||
Fat Mass | Lean Mass |
Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide INHBE + |
(9 mpk) | (0.48 mpk) Tirzepatide | |
(0.48 mpk) |
reduced fasting glucose levels |
• Activin E signaling regulates adipose lipid storage and |
mobilization |
• Activin E levels are elevated in individuals with obesity, insulin |
resistance, and NAFLD |
• siRNA targeting hepatic INHBE has potential to be a novel |
therapeutic for metabolic diseases |
AIM
• Evaluate the potential therapeutic benefits of INHBE silencing in |
obese and diabetic mouse models with a mouse surrogate of |
mIN | 0.37 | |||||||||
0.5 | ||||||||||
Relative | ||||||||||
0.06 | ||||||||||
0.0 | ||||||||||
Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide | ||||||||
(9 mpk) | (0.48 mpk) | |||||||||
Body Weight | ||||||||||
100 | Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide | |||||||
change | 75 | |||||||||
50 | ||||||||||
25 | ||||||||||
BW | ||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||
% | ||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | ||
-25 | ||||||||||
-50 |
mpk, weekly), or |
tirzepatide (0.48 mpk, |
daily) |
▪ n=10 for each treatment |
group |
▪ INHBE mRNA expression |
reduced by ~95% |
▪ INHBE silencing led to a |
19% suppression of body |
weight compared to |
saline controls |
Mass | 15 | ||
10 | |||
5 | 3.35 | ||
0 | |||
Fat Mass | Lean Mass |
- Body composition analysis through DEXA imaging indicates a 26% loss of fat mass and preservation
of lean mass with INHBE silencing
- Weekly SC dosing of mouse surrogate ARO-INHBE in db/db mice (n=10 per treatment group) resulted in: 1) 15% suppression in BW compared to the saline group, 2) 26% loss of fat mass, 3) lean mass retention, 4) lack of improvement in oGTT
PHARMACODYNAMIC STUDY OF ARO- INHBE IN CYNOMOLGUS MONKEYS
ARO-INHBE 3 mpk SC
Liver biopsy
ARO-INHBE |
• Evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of ARO-INHBE in |
cynomolgus monkeys |
Impact on glycemic control is mild based on oGTT, fasting
glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR indicators
AUC of oGTT | Fasting Glucose |
INHBE KD improves catecholamine sensitivity, increasing
lipid mobilization and oxidation
NEFA | β-hydroxybutyrate |
Day -7 Day 1 Day 15 Day 29 Day 57 Day 85
METHODS
Rodent studies
• Diet-induced obese (DIO) and db/db mouse models |
✱✱✱ | 500 | ||||||||
80000 | ns | glucosesting Fa | 400 | ||||||
g/dL)(m levels | |||||||||
(OGTT)AUC | 60000 | 300 | |||||||
40000 | 200 | ||||||||
20000 | 100 | ||||||||
0 | 0 | ||||||||
Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide | Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide | ||||
80 | Fasting Insulin | 20 | HOMA-IR | D-5 | |||||
Fasting insulin (ng/mL) | 60 | 15 | D29 | ||||||
D57 | |||||||||
IR-HOMA | |||||||||
40 | 10 | D85 | |||||||
20 | 5 | ||||||||
0 | 0 | ||||||||
Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide | Saline | INHBE | Tirzepatide |
2.5 | ns |
2.0 |
mmol/L | 1.5 | ||||
1.0 | |||||
0.5 | |||||
0.0 | |||||
Saline | INHBE | ||||
14 | pgWAT | ||||
levels | 12 | ||||
mRNA | 10 | ||||
8 | |||||
Relative | 6 | ||||
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
0 | |||||
Adrb3 | Atgl | Cgi-58 | Hsl | Fabp4 |
2.5 | ✱✱ | ||||
mmol/L | 2.0 | ||||
1.0 | |||||
1.5 | |||||
0.5 | |||||
0.0 | |||||
Saline | INHBE | ||||
8 | iWAT | ||||
levels | |||||
6 | |||||
mRNA | |||||
4 | |||||
Relative | |||||
2 | |||||
0 | |||||
Adrb3 | Atgl | Cgi-58 | Hsl | Fabp4 |
Expression | 7)ARL1,-D | 1.5 | ||||
1.00 | ||||||
RelativeNHBEI | (Normalizedto | 1.0 | ||||
0.5 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.33 | |||
0.17 | ||||||
0.0 | ||||||
D-7 | D15 | D29 | D57 | D85 |
▪ | After a single 3 mpk SC dose, hepatic INHBE mRNA expression |
was reduced by ~70% (n=3; n=2 on D57 and D85) | |
▪ | Knockdown was maintained through D85 with a second dose |
• Dosing regimen: weekly 9 mpk subcutaneous (SC) dosing of |
mouse surrogate ARO-INHBE; daily 0.48 mpk tirzepatide as |
benchmark; co-treatment of weekly INHBE (9 mpk) and daily |
- Animals were fasted for 6 hours prior to glucose homeostasis analysis
- INHBE KD animals treated with CL316,243 (1 mpk, IP) had increased circulating ketone levels and expression of lipolytic genes relative to control group
on D29 |
tirzepatide (0.48 mpk) |
• Body weight, body composition (lean versus fat mass) via Dual X- |
ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, glucose homeostasis (fasting |
Increased lipid mobilization with INHBE silencing does not
lead to liver steatosis
Co-treatment of tirzepatide with INHBE siRNA allows use of lower tirzepatide dose for similar therapeutic effect in DIO mice
CONCLUSIONS
glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, oGTT), lipid metabolism (non- |
esterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyrate) assessed at various |
points over the course of the studies |
Non-human primate study
- Cynomolgus monkeys (n=3) received 2 SC doses (D1 and D29) of ARO-INHBE at 3 mpk
- Liver biopsies were collected for INHBE mRNA expression via qRT-PCR
Saline | INHBE RNAi |
▪ H&E staining of the | |
liver indicate there is | |
less fat accumulation | |
in DIO mice treated | |
with INHBE RNAi |
change%BW
60 | Saline | INHBE (9 mpk) | Tirzepatide (0.21 mpk) | |||
Co-treat (9 mpk + 0.14 mpk)
40
20
0 | |||||||||||
8 | 15 | 22 | 29 | 36 | 43 | 50 | 57 | 64 | 71 | 78 | 85 |
-20 |
-40
-60
- Co-treatedDIO mice (n=10 per treatment group) were administered 9 mpk mouse surrogate ARO-INHBE weekly and 0.14 mpk tirzepatide daily
- Co-treatedmice showed similar levels of %BW change as mice treated with a higher dose level of tirzepatide
- ARO-INHBEis a potent RNAi therapeutic capable of silencing hepatic INHBE mRNA expression
- Pre-clinicalstudies with a mouse surrogate of ARO-INHBE in DIO and db/db models indicate that INHBE KD potentially leads to a suppression in body weight gain, loss of fat mass, and preservation of lean mass likely due to the increased lipolysis
- Co-treatmentof tirzepatide with INHBE RNAi has the potential to allow for the use of a lower tirzepatide dose without compromising
the therapeutic effect
Attachments
- Original Link
- Original Document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc. published this content on 24 June 2024 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 24 June 2024 11:42:18 UTC.