Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
After market 05:53:49 pm | |||
177.5 USD | +1.50% | 177.7 | +0.13% |
09:01pm | UAW trails in early unionization vote counting at Alabama Mercedes factory | RE |
07:51pm | Sector Update: Consumer Stocks Mixed in Friday Afternoon Trading | MT |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.
Weaknesses
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 79.15 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- Based on current prices, the company has particularly high valuation levels.
- In relation to the value of its tangible assets, the company's valuation appears relatively high.
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-28.75% | 558B | C | ||
-33.37% | 26.73B | C- | ||
-42.06% | 10.88B | D+ | ||
-44.92% | 10.33B | - | - | |
-55.95% | 10.08B | D | ||
-43.49% | 7.8B | B | ||
-33.14% | 6.64B | D+ | ||
0.00% | 6.59B | - | - | |
0.00% | 5.79B | - | - | |
-12.32% | 5.29B | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- TSLA Stock
- Ratings Tesla, Inc.