Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
63.6 SEK | -0.53% | +0.19% | -17.06% |
May. 14 | Loimua to Build Government-backed Heating, Cooling Plant on SSAB Site in Finland | MT |
May. 14 | Anglo-BHP takeover saga is full of twists and turns |
Summary
- The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.
- The equity is one of the most attractive in the market with regard to earnings multiple-based valuation.
- The company is one of the most undervalued, with an "enterprise value to sales" ratio at 0.4 for the 2024 fiscal year.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.
- For the last twelve months, analysts have been gradually revising upwards their EPS forecast for the upcoming fiscal year.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Iron & Steel
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-17.06% | 5.9B | B+ | ||
-1.10% | 41.27B | B- | ||
+20.36% | 25.06B | C+ | ||
-20.32% | 22.32B | B | ||
-5.47% | 21.62B | C+ | ||
+13.40% | 21.04B | B | ||
+1.61% | 19.45B | B | ||
+4.66% | 9.37B | B | ||
-14.25% | 8.33B | B+ | ||
+36.80% | 8.28B | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SSAB A Stock
- Ratings SSAB AB