Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
8.06 HKD | -3.36% | -4.84% | -33.50% |
May. 24 | New Times Energy Arm Rents Offices in Hong Kong | MT |
May. 16 | New World joins up with Shum Yip on innovation and tech property projects | RE |
Summary
- Overall, the company has poor fundamentals for a medium to long-term investment strategy.
- Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.
Strengths
- The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- This company will be of major interest to investors in search of a high dividend stock.
- For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 3.29 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- Most analysts recommend that the stock should be sold or reduced.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Real Estate Development & Operations
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-33.50% | 2.69B | B | ||
+31.22% | 27.05B | B- | ||
+3.04% | 26.56B | B- | ||
-13.85% | 25.79B | B | ||
+17.84% | 25.12B | A- | ||
+10.47% | 21.52B | A | ||
+35.54% | 21.35B | A- | ||
-2.40% | 18.22B | B- | ||
+44.42% | 17.56B | B+ | ||
+5.25% | 17.06B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- 17 Stock
- Ratings New World Development Company Limited