Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
15.16 USD | -3.01% | -4.71% | -33.71% |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company's earnings per share (EPS) are expected to grow significantly over the next few years according to the consensus of analysts covering the stock.
- The company shows low valuation levels, with an enterprise value at 0.4 times its sales.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- Analyst opinion has improved significantly over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The firm trades with high earnings multiples: 32.56 times its 2025 earnings per share.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: IT Services & Consulting
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-33.71% | 2.8B | A | ||
-15.15% | 189B | A- | ||
+1.23% | 167B | B+ | ||
+3.74% | 157B | B- | ||
+4.43% | 102B | A- | ||
+35.84% | 85.01B | C- | ||
+10.16% | 83.93B | A- | ||
-4.92% | 73.3B | A | ||
-24.25% | 52.32B | C | ||
-7.35% | 44.09B | A- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- DXC Stock
- Ratings DXC Technology Company