ZAMPNPV |
Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
| 3.4 BRL | -1.73% |
|
+7.94% | -40.35% |
| Jun. 06 | Mubadala-backed Zamp to buy Starbucks brand rights, stores in Brazil | RE |
| May. 06 | Transcript : Zamp S.A., Q1 2024 Earnings Call, May 06, 2024 |
Summary
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a relative ranking of the company within its sector, comes out particularly poor.
Strengths
- With regards to fundamentals, the enterprise value to sales ratio is at 0.78 for the current period. Therefore, the company is undervalued.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
Weaknesses
- The potential for earnings per share (EPS) growth in the coming years appears limited according to current analyst estimates.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Restaurants & Bars
| 1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -40.35% | 175M | D+ | ||
| -13.59% | 185B | C | ||
| +38.57% | 87.04B | B- | ||
| +7.13% | 39.42B | A- | ||
| -7.60% | 23.29B | - | - | |
| -11.97% | 21.76B | C | ||
| +24.58% | 17.89B | C | ||
| -17.09% | 13.65B | A+ | ||
| +49.58% | 11.27B | C+ | ||
| -2.88% | 6.9B | - |
Investor Rating
Trading Rating
ESG Refinitiv
Financials
Sales growth
Earnings Growth
EBITDA / Sales
Profitability
Finances
Valuation
P/E ratio
EV / Sales
Price to Book
Price to Free Cash Flow
-
Yield
Momentum
1 year Revenue revision
4 months Revenue revision
7 days Revenue revision
1 year EPS revision
4 months EPS revision
Consensus
Analyst Opinion
Potential Price Target
4m Target Price Revision
4m Revision of opinion
12m Revision of opinion
Business Predictability
Analyst Coverage
Divergence of Estimates
Divergence of analysts' opinions
Divergence of Target Price
Earnings quality
Environment
Emissions
Innovation
Use of resources
Governance
CSR Strategy
Management
Shareholders
Controversy
Controversy
- Stock Market
- Equities
- BKBR3 Stock
- Ratings ZAMPNPV
