Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
28.24 EUR | +0.66% | +2.21% | -16.03% |
May. 30 | German Shares Edge Up as Eurozone Sentiment Data Improves | MT |
May. 30 | Burning Rock Biotech to Work With Bayer to Increase Patient Access to Precision Cancer Medicines in China | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- The company's attractive earnings multiples are brought to light by a P/E ratio at 12.36 for the current year.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
- Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- One of the major weak points of the company is its financial situation.
- The company is not the most generous with respect to shareholders' compensation.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Pharmaceuticals
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-16.03% | 30.09B | B- | ||
+40.73% | 739B | C+ | ||
+32.83% | 598B | B | ||
-6.30% | 353B | C+ | ||
+15.15% | 318B | B- | ||
+4.05% | 285B | C+ | ||
+15.00% | 240B | B+ | ||
-5.52% | 206B | A+ | ||
+6.17% | 164B | C+ | ||
-0.45% | 162B | C+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- BAYN Stock
- Ratings Bayer AG