Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
16.92 CAD | -2.03% | -3.37% | +55.94% |
Jun. 05 | Antofagasta to invest $1.5 bln for water transport system in Chile copper mine | RE |
May. 30 | UBS Raises its Copper Price Forecast on Dropping Supply | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
- The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.
Strengths
- The company's EBITDA/Sales ratio is relatively high and results in high margins before depreciation, amortization and taxes.
- The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
- The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- One of the major weak points of the company is its financial situation.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last four months, the sales outlook for the coming years has been revised downwards. No recovery of the group's activities is yet foreseen.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Specialty Mining & Metals
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+55.94% | 10.17B | A- | ||
+77.48% | 52.05B | - | ||
+27.72% | 26.91B | B- | ||
+8.90% | 13.91B | B- | ||
+16.71% | 7.18B | B- | ||
+19.23% | 6.98B | - | - | |
+15.55% | 6.69B | C | ||
+44.19% | 5.1B | B- | ||
+24.43% | 3.94B | - | D+ | |
+71.47% | 3.58B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- FM Stock
- Ratings First Quantum Minerals Ltd.