Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
Pre-market 07:00:07 am | |||
30.74 USD | +1.09% | 30.84 | +0.34% |
Jun. 06 | ASML to Deliver Advanced Chipmaking Machine to TSMC | MT |
Jun. 05 | Intel Reportedly Partners With South Korea's Naver to Expand Gaudi-based Platform | MT |
Summary
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.
Strengths
- The company's profit outlook over the next few years is a strong asset.
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been strongly revised upwards.
- Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.
Weaknesses
- The group shows a rather high level of debt in proportion to its EBITDA.
- The company's valuation in terms of earnings multiples is rather high. Indeed, the firm is getting paid 222.54 times its estimated earnings per share for the ongoing year.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- Revenue estimates are regularly revised downwards for the current and coming years.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Semiconductors
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-38.83% | 131B | C+ | ||
+144.11% | 2,971B | B- | ||
+48.23% | 703B | A- | ||
+26.01% | 652B | C | ||
+13.88% | 271B | B- | ||
+42.86% | 231B | B- | ||
+14.75% | 178B | A- | ||
+53.43% | 145B | B+ | ||
+81.74% | 142B | - | ||
+18.24% | 116B | A- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- INTC Stock
- Ratings Intel Corporation