Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.048 USD | +7.87% | -10.57% | -97.29% |
Jun. 04 | Fisker Defaults on $3.5 Million Short-Term Loan | DJ |
May. 30 | New cars: Hardly any cars under one ton - but some over three | DP |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Strengths
- Analysts expect a sharply increasing business volume for the group, with high growth rates in the coming years.
- The difference between current prices and the average target price is rather important and implies a significant appreciation potential for the stock.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
Weaknesses
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- Most analysts agree on a negative opinion with regard to the stock. Indeed, the average consensus issues recommendations to underperform or sell.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Auto & Truck Manufacturers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-97.29% | 67.54M | C | ||
-28.98% | 566B | C | ||
-47.54% | 21.31B | C- | ||
-50.04% | 11.47B | D | ||
-52.69% | 10.19B | - | ||
-47.91% | 9.99B | D+ | ||
-35.99% | 6.3B | D+ | ||
0.00% | 5.88B | - | - | |
0.00% | 5.44B | - | - | |
-23.53% | 4.67B | - |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SPAQ Stock
- Ratings Fisker Inc.