Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
17.51 CAD | -1.74% | -3.26% | +61.38% |
May. 30 | UBS Raises its Copper Price Forecast on Dropping Supply | MT |
May. 24 | Risk of Sharp Copper Price Correction "Very High," Macquarie Says | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
- According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.
Strengths
- Before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, the company's margins are particularly high.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.
- The opinion of analysts covering the stock has improved over the past four months.
Weaknesses
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- With an enterprise value anticipated at 4.7 times the sales for the current fiscal year, the company turns out to be overvalued.
- The firm pays small or no dividend to shareholders. For that reason, it is not a yield company.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of analysts who cover the stock differ significantly. This implies difficulties in evaluating the company and its business.
- The company's earnings releases usually do not meet expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Specialty Mining & Metals
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+61.38% | 10.61B | A- | ||
+84.35% | 53.9B | - | ||
+31.17% | 27.63B | B- | ||
+10.96% | 14.18B | B- | ||
+23.63% | 7.7B | B- | ||
+20.73% | 7B | C | ||
+19.23% | 6.98B | - | - | |
+48.84% | 5.3B | B- | ||
+30.04% | 4.12B | - | D+ | |
+82.44% | 3.84B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- FM Stock
- Ratings First Quantum Minerals Ltd.